
Flannery O’Connor
One of my favorite factoids about Flannery O’Connor is that she liked to raise domestic birds. Me, I prefer my fowl viewed through binoculars at difficult-to-identify distances with a tattered Peterson Field Guide. I like to stroll along through a damp wood, listen to happy, whistled melodies, and have no idea which variety of bird is making that sound. Why anyone would want to keep parrots in cages or raise guinea hens out back is beyond my comprehension. I’d rather have a snake in a terrarium than a squawking, crapping, stinking, molting bird. Still, I just love it that Flannery loved them.
When she was a little girl in Savannah, Flannery taught her pet bantam chicken to walk backward. It was recorded by a Yankee cameraman, appearing on newsreels across America in 1932. I learned about the trick back in April, while visiting Flannery’s childhood home. There, in that narrow little unimpressive house, with its view of St. John the Baptist Cathedral through distorted glass, Mary Flannery decided, at age 6, that she was ready to be an adult. She started calling her parents by their first names and quit going to Sunday school, instead attending Mass with the grownups. When the nuns at St. Vincent’s Grammar School tried to punish her, Mary Flannery informed them that the church would not dictate how the O’Connor family chose to worship. That was one of the first fights the tenacious young author would win against conformity.
When we visited Andalusia on Thursday, the 544-acre farm where Flannery O’Connor lived her last 14 years and wrote most of the work that she published, the best thing that happened was having my Savannah memories stirred. I didn’t learn anything new. I liked seeing her bedroom, how her desk was set up, the crutches leaning against the bookshelf to remind visitors of the painful lupus which ultimately claimed her at the young age of 39. The peahens in the aviary are not descendants of her birds, but I pulled up short in front of the strutting, colorful cock, who yanked me right down memory lane.

As Paul and I drive along, stopping to visit historic landmarks of authors we have loved, I wonder… why? What exactly is it that makes me want to visit people’s houses, look at their gardens and their beds, their dishes and their empty bourbon bottles?
I know at least part of it is that I want some kind of connection – still, at my age – or maybe it’s especially at my age. My writing is no more like Flannery O’Connor’s than it was 25 years ago, but I do consider her an influence. I tend to think that I, too, strive to create characters upon whom grace is visited (in spite of themselves).
But that's where I get a little bit tangled - what exactly is grace? I'm sure not talking about the dictionary definition of "the state of being protected or sanctified by the favor of God." When I think of grace, I'm talking about goodwill; I'm talking about "a disposition to be generous or helpful." I want that to also be what Flannery's talking about, her being a good nonconformist and all. Never mind that the docent at Andalusia reminded me she attended mass with her mother almost every single day of her life. Her grace and my grace might not be synonymous.
A casual chat with Paul brings a touch of clarity. (Yet another of the reasons why I love this man - we talk about books and authors as casually as folks talk about the weather, and in a relaxed conversation, I wind up learning something.) I read him the quote and he nods enthusiastically, says, "O'Connor is very much about grace. She's a traditional Roman Catholic Southern Christian woman whose goal for her characters is salvation, redemption, grace. But the paths that they take are shocking, surprising, tortuous... and not at all traditional. She wants to take her characters right to the point where they have a chance to be saved, but she stops before they have a chance to cross the threshold to salvation." He says something else, something wise and wonderful about maybe it's not even the characters so much as it's her readers that that are poised on that threshold ... but as we're drinking wine in our hotel room on the Mississippi River now, I'm losing my ability to focus on these lofty considerations at all.
Meanwhile, I'm still wading in the shallows, and trivial though it felt, I did stop at the aviary at Andalusia long enough to aim my camera at that big blue peacock. I smiled at it, glad it didn’t want to get any closer to me than I to it. I zoomed in with the lens, paused for a moment, and then snapped its picture.
1 comment:
Bravo! And if I had to venture a guess, Id say you know why you visit these places. Connection; to people you admire and respect for having done what you aspire to accomplish. Writing, seems to me, is difficult work. I think you're hoping to discover a secret or a hidden message left behind by an author that has been waiting just for you to find. And when found, suddenly the mystery of being an author, will be revealed. Funny, Im fairly certain you have already made that discovery.
Of course I could be way off base on this too! Hey, some people follow musicians, some follow athletes, some follow movie stars, & you follow writers. Perfectly natural.
Loved how Paul explained O'Connor's grace. To bring a character, or the reader, to the threshold of recieving grace only to deny it, is brilliant writing. It is her way of playing god and make it appear that it was the character's choice, when it never was. Sounds to me like she was trying to express how she truly felt about her religion without being accused of sacrilege. Again, me way off base is likely.
Thanks so much for blogging. Thoroughly enjoying it. Say hello to the mighy Mississippi for me!
Post a Comment